安徽体育科技

职业足球劳资纠纷具有专业性和时效性，传统的解决方式：足协内部裁决、劳动仲裁、诉讼各存不足。新《体育法》设立体育仲裁机构，但未明确将劳资纠纷纳入管辖范围。本文通过分析中国现状与土耳其经验，提出职业足球劳资纠纷适用体育仲裁的合理性。土耳其通过强制仲裁和独立仲裁人员选任程序高效解决纠纷，但其排除司法审查的做法值得商榷。建议中国在体育仲裁中保障当事人诉权、优化仲裁人员选任程序，并建立多元纠纷解决机制，衔接行业内部调解与司法救济，以平衡效率与公平，推动职业足球健康发展。

Professional football labor disputes have professionalism and timeliness, and traditional solutions such as internal arbitration, labor arbitration, and litigation have their own shortcomings. The new Sports Law establishes sports arbitration institutions, but does not explicitly include labor disputes in its jurisdiction. By analyzing the current situation of China and the experience of Türkiye, this paper puts forward the rationality of sports arbitration to professional football labor disputes. Türkiye solves disputes efficiently through compulsory arbitration and independent arbitrator selection procedures, but its practice of excluding judicial review is questionable. It is suggested that China safeguard the litigation rights of parties in sports arbitration, optimize the selection process of arbitrators, and establish a diversified dispute resolution mechanism to connect internal mediation and judicial relief in the industry, in order to balance efficiency and fairness and promote the healthy development of professional football.